Archive for the ‘Bail Bond Laws’ Category

Who can you Trust in the Bail Bonds Industry?

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011

Only people who have never truly dealt with the bail bonds industry would ever tell you that you can’t trust anyone in it. That would be an extremely negative way to look at the industry, and it would still be very negative if you said that most people couldn’t be trusted. It’s simply not true, especially in these modern times where the bail bonds industry has improved dramatically over the last few decades. It is no longer an industry that is littered with untrustworthy people; it is now littered with fantastic bail bond agencies who offer you an excellent level of service and high quality customer care.

-

That being said, there are still some people out there who want to ruin it for everyone else. These people are only interested in making a quick buck, and to call them bail bondsmen would be a huge compliment. Most of them are little more than scammers. They will try to entice you with promises of incredibly low prices and turnaround times that seem too good to be true. Well unfortunately they are. These people will just take your money and run with it instead of actually helping you bail someone out of jail.

-

To avoid these people, you just need to use your instincts. Only talk to bail bond agencies that have a good reputation and who will talk to you about your situation. Ask them for more information about their company, and if you aren’t happy with the answers, tell them that you’d like to look elsewhere. You don’t have to start the process straight away; you can talk to the bail bond agency and try to figure out whether they are a team of people that you would like to deal with.

What is the easiest way to bail someone out of jail?

Monday, January 10th, 2011

The easiest and simplest way to bail someone out of jail is to use a great bail bond agency. If you choose such an agency, you’ll be able to sit back and relax while they handle the majority of the work load, and within a matter of hours you can have bailed your friend or family member out of jail. The bail bonds process only really becomes complex when things start to go wrong, and that usually happens if you deal with a bail bond agency who isn’t particularly good at their job, or a bondsman who doesn’t really care about his customers.

Once you’ve chosen your high quality bail bondsman or bail bond agency, you’ll be asked for some details. These will be very simple, personal details along with some proof of identification and some information about the person you are trying to bail out of jail. Once you’ve given them this information, they will ask you for the 10% premium that you need to pay them up front. Some agencies may arrange a short term loan for you, but this is not something you can count on.

After that, you’ll have to provide collateral, and once the bail bond agency is satisfied that you have provided sufficient collateral to cover the full amount of the bail bond, they will complete the application. Once that’s done, you just have to wait for the jail to finalize the inmate release process, which shouldn’t take too long, and then it’s all over – you will have successfully navigated the bail bonds process. As you can see already, it’s really not that difficult if you choose a reliable bail bond agency who is actually interested in helping their customers, not just making money.

Swipe and Go Bail Bonds; WHAT?

Monday, August 30th, 2010
A St. Petersburg Times editorial published on August 15, 2010 entitled, “Getting out of jail moves into the plastic age,” stated getting out of jail on credit was, “priceless.”  Click here to view the editorial.
-
The editorial failed to mention that the new system might also be “dangerous” and “irresponsible.”
-
For the Sheriff to hire an out-of-state online service to, in effect be responsible for making sure defendants show up for court, has obvious problems written all over it.  How will this software company ensure that defendants actually show up for their court appearance?  What will they do if defendants fail to show? 
-
I believe I can answer those two questions.
-
First, they will do nothing to ensure that those who swipe their way out of jail are present in court.
-
Second, they will simply call the Sheriff’s office to retrieve the AWOL defendant, thereby incurring more costs on the citizens.  (When someone pays for bail it is the bail agent’s responsibility to find and retrieve the errant defendant – at no cost to taxpayers.)
From all appearances, these swipe-and-go methods are not only a cash cow for local governments and/or Sheriff’s; they completely ignore the reality of costs associated with no-show defendants, a large percentage of who are likely to commit another crime. 
The editorial stated that limiting these credit card systems appears to be an “unnecessary protection for the bail business” fails to recognize the fundamentals of what local bail agents actually do.
-
When someone commits a crime, a judge determines (as he or she should) the flight risk and the potential danger the defendant may pose to the community.  In order to keep our jails from becoming over-crowded, the judge can either release the person on his/her own recognizance, which is a promise on their part to return for court, put them in a government-run and taxpayer-funded pretrial release program, or set an amount of bail to guarantee that the person will return on his or her court date.
-
In the third scenario, a private and local bail bonds agent will accept responsibility for the defendant’s return and will charge the defendant and not the taxpayers to provide that service.  Once the responsibility is transferred to the bail agent, it is that agent’s job (with money on the line) to make sure the defendant returns to court.  By all accounts, including years of statistics compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, this system works extremely well and costs taxpayers nothing.
-
The swipe-and-go system run by an out-of state online system completely removes any transfer of responsibility to a licensed and bonded agent who lives and works in the local community.  It removes the economic interest that an agent has in making sure the defendant shows up for court.  By doing so, we will see a reduction in the “show up” rate, a likely rise in repeat crimes, and extra costs to taxpayers for requiring law enforcement to retrieve the missing defendant.
-
Turning this part of our criminal justice system into a system akin to buying gas – commit a crime and be out of jail with no hassles and no inconvenience – will have long-term negative consequences, will cost taxpayers money in the long run and will do nothing to keep our streets safer.
-
In closing, for the St. Petersburg Times to minimize or trivialize these so-called “Spring Break” crimes is misguided.  We are talking about dangerous drunk drivers, assaults on local residents, and other crimes that are more than simply mischievous.  A drunk driver or an assailant should be considered a very real criminal and a very real threat to our public safety.  The swipe-and-go methods simply make it easier – much easier – for those criminals to be back out on the street quicker and with virtually no oversight.
-
Priceless!

Mason-Dixon Poll Finds Voters Oppose Use of Tax Dollars for Bail

Monday, April 5th, 2010

ALEC Calls on Florida Lawmakers to Pass SB 782 and HB 445

Washington D.C. - The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) today released the findings of a recent Mason-Dixon poll showing that Florida voters strongly favor enacting a statewide law that would limit the use of their tax dollars to paying only for the release of indigent defendants who have been charged with a non-violent crime.  Statewide, 71% supported limiting the use of tax dollars, while 22% were opposed and 7% were undecided.

Currently, the Florida Legislature is considering Senate Bill 782 by Senator John Thrasher (R-St. Augustine) and House Bill 445 by Representative Chris Dorworth (R-Lake Mary), pertaining to changing Florida Statute, as it relates to the government-run pretrial release programs.  SB 782 and HB 445 requires that the defendant meet certain specified criteria in order to be eligible for pretrial release; narrows who is eligible for taxpayer-funded pretrial services/release programs; and moves more criminal offenders to a private, regulated and licensed bail system, while still allowing for the continued use of pretrial programs for non-violent, first-time, non-dangerous indigent offenders.

ALEC has made reforming government-run bail a priority and believes this legislation will benefit Floridians.

Support for the measure has widened to the Florida’s voters, as by the Mason-Dixon poll:

94% felt criminal defendants who have failed to appear in court on a previous offense should not be allowed to be released from jail using tax dollars.

·     87% felt that if a criminal defendant can afford to pay their own bail for release from jail, they should not be allowed to be released from jail using tax dollars. 

·     86% felt a criminal defendant that has been previously convicted of a violent crime should not be allowed to be released from jail using tax dollars, even if the court rules that they are indigent.

·     Only 15% of state voters were aware that 28 Florida counties allow criminals to be released from jail using taxpayer dollars instead of paying for their own release while they await trial.

  • Support for the measure cuts across party lines, with 65% of Democrats, 77% of Republicans and 72% of independentsfavoring such a law.

ALEC’s Public Safety Task Force Director Michael Hough said, “It is clear that taxpayers do not want to be left on the hook to pay the bill for releasing potentially dangerous criminals from jail. Pretrial release agencies should strictly serve the indigent, and commercial bail does a better job of protecting the public from dangerous criminals, while saving taxpayer dollars.”

The poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. of Washington, D.C. from March 23, 2010, through March 25, 2010, with a total of 625 registered Florida voters.  The margin of error is no more than plus or minus 4 percentage points. The poll is available here http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/cied/Mason-Dixon_poll.pdf

Weekly Bail Bond Legislative Updates

Monday, March 29th, 2010
Indiana Passes SB 293 Into Law
Bill strengthens 36 month bond expiration and provides for an exoneration of bond should prosecutor elect not to extradite a defendant held in custody in another jurisdiction.

Idaho Governor Signs SB 1371

SB 1371 was signed by Idaho Governor Otter on March 25.  This bill, in part, grants authority to judges to direct clerks and sheriffs to not accept bail bonds from a surety company with outstanding unpaid judgments.

Georgia Public Safety Bill Passes Out of House

HB 889 passed out of the House on March 26 and is now in the Senate.  HB 889 would restrict offenders charged with certain aggravated offenses for being released through pretrial services.  This public safety measure would ensure violent offenders would be released only on a secured bail bond.

Colorado Ballot Initiative on Pretrial Services Filed

This initiative, if passed, would permit only those offenders charged with their first offense, non violent felony or misdemeanor to be released through a pretrial services agency. The first hearing on this initiative is set for April 9 at 9:00 A.M. in House Committee Room 01-12.

Colorado Ballot Initiative Procedure